Nativism: Race and Immigrants

Nativism is the feeling that immigration and foreigners be detrimental to congenital-born Ameri washbasins. Unfortunately, nativists feelings be non based on political convenience or logical theories, scarcely on ignorant assumptions that produce religious, racial, and ethnical discrimination. M any(prenominal) nativist groups or individuals, both in the past and resignly, hurl virtuoso social occasion in common- the fear of non being in consider. The basic amour oneness has to see is that misinformation and short-sighted fear dissolve often produce the absence of law and shape-hearted dignity.The Ku Klux Klan was a racist group who also committed atrocities in the name of nativism. The KKKs were formed beca exercise many masses were started to puff afraid of the ascension power of the shamefuls and also nauseated immigration and Jews. What was the rising power of the blacks? Is it because they were not slaves or maybe because they simply cute to vote, a cons titutional make up African the Statesns were still treated like property in the federation under the Jim Crow Laws.African Americans were denied their constitutional right to vote by respective(a) ways of intimidation except yet the KKKs could do whatever they wanted and be protected by the constitutional idea that they had the right to fetch themselves. The KKKs were also anti-Semitic and anti-Semitism was prevalent in the U. S. To understand immigration better one has to see the f performors that produced and produce immigration to America. Industrialization and loving changes in Europe produced mass immigration from countries like Germany, France, and Ireland.The Industrial regeneration transformed the small, agri heathen society into a manufacturing economy which helped the U. S. to prosper and excel. companionable changes were an new(prenominal) major factor that stimulated immigration. Political upheavals, religious persecution, and a search for adventure were the bas ic reason for the relocation of these people. wherefore would they fix to the U. S. to purposely try to create a political or cultural upheaval, if the whole reason they left their homelands was escape these worrys?The truth of the matter is that they bonnie wanted to seek a peaceful setting that they could create a family and contribute to American society. There were two types of immigrants- the old and the new. The old immigrants of the past( which so was also divided into old and new immigration categories) and the new immigrants of right away mostly the Hispanics and Asians. Most of the old immigrants were Europeans- French, Irish, German, Italian, and Polish. Although the new immigrants of that time were discriminated by the aborigine Americans and the older immigrants ( British, French, and German) there was not the same animosity that is seen between stupefy immigrants and native Americans. In the present, 86% of the newest immigration comes from Latin America and As ia date Europe solo contributes 10%. The main difference between present immigration and past immigration is that most immigrants from Europe were male and exsanguine however, present immigration is that most of todays newcomers are from underdeveloped Countries therefore, most are colored people who, either are espouse or fork out a family.Some may theorize that new immigrants are less skilled than the old immigrants and that furthermore, they do not want to alter but actually most of the newest immigrants are educated and professionally trained. The b different with the American g all overnment is that they dont give Hispanics or Asians any opportunities because they know that these immigrants will succeed In fact what they do is subdue these immigrants until these people get fed up and retaliate for survival past the Americans ordain how much a problem immigrants are without knowing that in time of vulnerability any human being is going to act irrational.This is a da y to day event in the U. S. one could say it is political drowning of an immigrant. Why is it that these immigrants cannot harbour equal jobs as the people who have been educated here? The idea that new immigrants cannot effectively contribute to the American economy bonny because they are culturally different is simply naive. Why is it that the old immigrants did contribute to the advancement of the American economy and the newer immigrants are people who are just useful for menial jobs? genius hopes that societys judgment of present immigration is not determined just on their color of skin.The problem with American society is the pessimistic attitude they witness when things are not going their way. As Harry Truman wisely said, A pessimist is one who makes difficulties of his opportunities and an optimist is one who makes opportunities of his difficulties Economically speaking, immigration is beneficial for the American economy. some(prenominal) arguments are given to try to prove this wrong. Some may say that immigrants take away jobs from Americans. But what jobs? Most immigrants work as maids or janitors, jobs that Americans do not want to do.What would the U. S. do without immigrants who are willing to do humiliating jobs for scarce amounts of money? Or maybe these critics of immigration are talking to the highest degree the few amount of immigrants who want to excel and move around successful? The anti-immigration people feel threatened and fear that these minorities will thrash the native Americans and they will no coherenter be able to control and manipulate these ignorant, gullible immigrants. Another argument is that immigrants receive more than their uninfected share of welfare benefits.But yet again in actuality immigrants pay their elegant share of taxes. Julian Simon, an economist states, immigrant families typically pay more taxes than their native counterparts do. Also according to Julian Simon, immigrants arrive young and hea lthy and use fewer services on the average than do native families. young waves of young immigrants do not receive expensive Social Security, Medicare, and other aid to the aged. Finally a common argument is that for the U. S. , immigration is not an economic necessity but a luxury. And like all luxuries, it can help- or it can hurt.The American economy is vital for the existence of the set that this elected nation was based on. Its ignorant to say that immigrants do not boost or stimulate the American economy jam Carter, Jr. once said, Our American values are not luxuries but necessitiesnot the salt in our bread, but the bread itself. Our common peck of a free and just society is our greatest source of glueyness at home and strength abroadgreater than the bounty of our physical blessings. The common vision that Carter was talking well-nigh was and is the most important thing of all- moral valuesCurrently there are some fabrications that unsighted American society concerni ng immigration. For instance the myth that most immigrants are culpable eventhough, no one really knows how many illegals there are, it is estimated that 300,000 people accede the country illegally each year compared more than a cardinal people who are entering the U. S. legally. Another myth is that most immigrants have less education than native-born Americans. Actually of African-born residents, 88% have had a high school education or better compared with the 77% of native-born who have had a high school education or better.Lastly, the myth that the newer immigrants refuse to learn side of meat. Most of the new immigrants want to learn English but since their so busy trying to survive and work, they dont have the time or money to have English classes. It seems that at of all the disliked races, the Hispanics and Asians are probably the worst discriminated class. Since blacks have pass appeased with what they have, they really dont create much of a problem. The whites can use them as their puppets and give them little treats such(prenominal) as an or so important job.The African- American community is complacent, besides a few black leaderS, they just want to leave things the way they are. Unfortunately the blacks have departed so far and advanced so much that they dont want to risk losing it all eventhough, the dream that powerful people such as Dr. Martin Luther King had has not yet been accomplished. It seems that everything that goes wrong is blamed on the Hispanics and Asians. The Asians have always been discriminated somehow in American History low from California discriminating the Chinese to the Japanese internment camps after bone Harbor.The U. S. has neer really had a solid relationship with Asia. But what about Hispanics? In the Immigration Act of 1921 their was no limits put on Latin American countries because the U. S. wanted a not bad(predicate) diplomatic relation with Latin America and because cheap labor from Mexico was call for o n the farms of California. One could plead the throughout American invoice immigration has been validated by American society if it is beneficial for the natives in America just as grand they dont feel threatened.For instance the Bracero Program, in 1942 when America needed the labor of aliens to help it with its war effort they allowed Mexicans to work temporarily in Americas industries. It appears that the volume of immigration seemed to rise sharply during periods of prosperity and to sink rapidly during periods of prosperity. The question still remains the same- is it really because of cultural differences or racial differences? But is it really a racial thing? Or does transcend just a simple racial problem? Are we really seeking racial equality?For so long The Nordic theory has told us that the white man deserves to be in power. For so long the white man has thought himself as the volume and all the other races see the white people as the plethoric race. But in reality t he white race is a minority, they in essence have psychological domination in that everybody thinks they are the overbearing race. All the minorities of the initiation resent the domination that white people have exerted for so long. This resentment turns into hate and eventually the minorities are going to do the same thing the whites did and sometimes even unconsciously do hate another human being.If one condemns the oppression of the white man than one is in danger of establishing his own form of pride in equality as a substitute for the racism he rejects. Furthermore he becomes arrogant over his own lack of arrogance and becomes prideful over his own lack of pride. To escape from this danger, he needs to cease list for the equality of all races, and just assume that racial identity makes no difference. There has always been the delusion of white supremacy based on the fact the white culture is vastly superior than any other culture.The genesis of the dogma of white superiori ty reveals a fundamental confusedness between supremacy and superiority. The first is an undeniable fact of the present world the second is an invention of the mind to defend the first. Basically the conclusion is that because he is supreme, he is also superior. For so long the colored man has had to classify to white control and pretty soon they are going to get fed up. This could lead to a racial war which would be supererogatory because this whole racial problem is spiritual not physicalIn conclusion nativism belongs to something deeper than just immigration or even racism. Most of the nativists in the Know-Nothings and the KKK did not know that they were blindly proclaiming that the white race is the supreme race. America was built on the basis of freedom and unalienable rights that most countries could not offer. The racial problem will never go away because of the disposition of a human being. A human being is individual and only cares about himself and unfortunately the U. S. is a capitalistic nation who only cares about its interests.One could wish that the social injustices, racial discrimination, and different stereo-types will cease to exist, but as long as humans live on this solid ground there will always be injustices. The U. S. government will never be perfect no matter how democratic the principles are. Unfortunately, democracy has its flaws and deficiencies just like and other government. Harry Truman wisely said, No government is perfect. One of the chief virtues of a democracy, however, is that its defects are always visible and under democratic processes can be pointed out and corrected. We will never live in a just and faultless world because it is both spiritually and psychologically impossible. And history will just keep repeating itself in a continuous cycle, history is a very powerful tool to adjust ones self with the human race or the human identity. But one has to remember that one of the best things about good history is its po wer to reduce national arrogance and to promote chiding and caution for later on. Until we start looking at the human history through the worlds perspective and not just American History, then we will truly excel not only as American people but as a human kind