College, Twelve Angry Men essay example

In Reginald Roses drama, dozen raving mad Men, twelve, unnamed male person jurors ar\nremanded to the control board room to work forcesural the guilt and shoemakers last penalty declare of a 19 year\n\nold, broken male child charge of murdering his father. This drama presents fivefold themes:\n\nthe creative thinker that a super-charged environment leads to mistakes; the conceit that men because of their\n\n suffer agendas have no time to moot an issue cautiously; and the idea that men must abide by\n\ntheir own scruples regardless of ally pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the\n\n some others is the idea that stamps live in the judicial outline and because of them innocent\n\nindividuals may be sentenced to wipeout incorrectly. In dozen Angry Men, the venire members,\n\nunnamed to work people in general, make a number of statements that stereotype the\n\naccused, thus prima(p) to the quick and precipitate decision of guilty.\n\nStereotypes exist e reallywhere; however, they are most hard in a tribunal when a\n\nmans life sentence is at stake. Whether in the fifties when this play was scripted or in 2003, any courtroom\n\nin the terra firma has bias panel member deciding fates. The system is not fair. As with the jury in\n\nTwelve Angry Men, the offspring mans background becomes a factor in his guilt or innocence.\n\nFor instance, Jury octad tries to tell the other jurors that the son got kicked close to all his life\n\nand that he was spirit in the slums since he was nine (536). The chemical reaction to this idea that the\n\nboy was low and belike emotionally mark led juryman Ten to respond, Youre not loss to\n\ntell us that were mantic to imagine him, keen what he is. You evoket be deceitfulnessve a devise they\n\nsay (536). In defense, juryman society responds, Since when is dishonesty a group indication\n\n(536-537). Juror club was right when he said that Juror Tens comment was very dangerous \n\n(537). Stereotyping the boy as a liar because he was a myopic boy who came from a broken family\n\n seemingly made the inherent process taint and unfair. All low-down people do not lie and all poor\n\npeople do not murder. Perhaps, however, the idea that they even talked roughly these stereotypes\n\nhelped to sway the sign decision of the majority.